1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 350 S.C.
  5. 350 S.C. 108 (2002)
 

STATE AUTO PROP. & CAS. INS. v. RAYNOLDS

No. 3488.

350 S.C. 108 (2002)

564 S.E.2d 677

STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Respondent, v. David W. RAYNOLDS, Sherry B. Raynolds, Harold Turner and Catherine Turner, Defendants, of whom David W. Raynolds and Sherry B. Raynolds are, Respondents/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided May 13, 2002.

Rehearing Denied June 19, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Stuart Mauney and Jennifer D. Eubanks, both of Gallivan, White & Boyd, of Greenville, for appellant/respondent.

Robert C. Childs, III and Laura W.H. Teer, both of Mitchell, Bouton, Yokel & Childs, of Greenville, for respondents/appellants.

CURETON, J.:

This is a declaratory judgment action to determine coverage under a homeowner's policy. The trial court found coverage existed under the policy but denied the insureds' request for attorney fees. Both parties appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

State Auto Insurance Company (State Auto) brought this declaratory judgment action alleging that the insureds, David W. and Sherry B. Raynolds, were not entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases