The findings of the Administrative Law Judge were supported by substantial evidence as to both charges against petitioner. In view of the nature of petitioner's offenses, involving repeated and persistent use of profanity, as well as insubordination, the penalty imposed was not disproportionate, much less so disproportionate as to shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v Safir,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
