IN RE NEWPORT CREAMERY, INC.

No. 01-13196.

275 B.R. 179 (2002)

In re NEWPORT CREAMERY, INC., Debtor.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.

February 15, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Bertozzi, Jr., Edwards & Angell, Providence, RI, Dominic L. Massari, III, Massari Law Group, Tampa, FL, for debtor.

Joseph Avanzato, Adler, Pollock & Sheehan, Providence, RI, Joseph H. Baldiga, Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, Worchester, MA, Mark J. Bernet, Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Weissler et al., Tampa, FL, John H. Bernstein, Kutak Rock LLP, Denver, CO, Mark E. Block, O'Brien Shafner Stuart, Kelly & Morris PC, Norwich, CT, David M. Boggs, MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen, Clearwater, FL, Paul J. Bogosian, Jr., Moore & Bogosian, Thomas E. Carlotto, Shechtman, Halperin & Savage, Providence, RI, Joseph P. Carroll, Woonsocket, RI, Barbara S. Cohen, Goldenberg & Muri, Providence, RI, Gerald Jr. D'Avolio, Assistant Attorney General, Boston, MA, Stephen DeLeo, Bristol, RI, William J. Delaney, Tillinghast, Licht, Perkins, Smith & Cohen, Providence, RI, Joseph M. DiOrio, Holland & Knight LLP, Providence, RI, Kenneth R. Dolbashian, c/o Chappell & Chappell, Portsmouth, RI, Richard W. Epstein, Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfield et al., Fort Lauderdale, FL, Brian K. Estep, Conway & Londregan PC, New London, CT, Deena C. Ethridge, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, Boston, MA, Larry M. Foyle, Tampa, FL, Gary M. Freedman, Tabas, Freedman & Soloff PA, Miami, FL, Peter J. Furness, Nixon Peabody LLP, Providence, RI, Lisa A. Geremia, Geremia & DeMarco, Providence, RI, Daniel B. Greenberg, Wilson, Orcutt, Cutter & Greenberg, P.C., Acton, MA, Van L. Hayhow, South Attleboro, MA, Gary P. Howayeck, Fall River, MA, Joseph, A. Keough, Jr., Keough & Sweeney, Pawtucket, RI, James M. Koelemay, General Counsel, Coca-Cola Fountain, Atlanta, GA, Jeffrey Kurtzman, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey et al., LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Lynda L. Laing, Strauss, Factor & Lopes, Providence, RI, Donald J. Lally, Jr., VanCouyghen & Lally, Wakefield, RI, Dennis J. LeVine, Dennis LeVine & Associates PA, Tampa, FL, Bernard J. Lemos, State of RI-Taxation, Providence, RI, John Levanti, Westerly, RI, Charles A. Lovell, Partridge, Snow & Hahn, Providence, RI, Christine D. Lynch, Goulston & Storrs, Boston, MA, Genevieve M. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, RI Dept. of Attorney General, Providence, RI, James A. Martin, MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen, Clearwater, FL, Warren J. Martin, Jr., Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, Morristown, NJ, Robert Masters, Acadia Realty Trust, Port Washington, NY, John P. McCoy, Carroll, Kelly & Murphey, Providence, RI, Richard S. Mittleman, Cameron & Mittleman, Providence, RI, William J. O'Brien, Jr., William J. O'Brien Incorporated, South Kingstown, RI, Joan E. Pilver, Assistant Attorney General, Hartford, CT, Charles A. Pisaturo, Jr., Law Offices of Charles A. Pisaturo Jr., Providence, RI, Peter Brent Regan, Sayer, Meyer & Regan, Newport, RI, Stephen A. Rodio, Rodio & Brown, Providence, RI, Douglas B. Rosner, Goulston & Storrs, Boston, MA, W. Mark, Russo, Ferrucci, Russo PC, Providence, RI, Matthew J. Sgambettera, Deily, Dautel & Mooney LLP, Albany, NY, David M.S. Shaiken, David M.S. Shaiken PC, Hartford, CT, Justin T. Shay, Cameron & Mittleman, Providence, RI, Allan M. Shine, Winograd, Shine & Zacks, Providence, RI, Andrew G. Sholes, Sholes & Sholes, Warwick, RI, Philip C. Silverman, Stanton & Davis, Marshfield, MA, Scott T. Spear, Blish & Cavanagh, Providence, RI, Gregory A. Splagounias, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Boston, MA, Patrick J. Sullivan, Sullivan & Sullivan, Coventry Commons, Coventry, RI, Marc D. Wallick, Wallick & Paolino, Warwick, RI, for creditor.

Kevin H. Graham, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP, Tampa, FL, pro se.

Robert N. Waldman, Warwick, RI, pro se.


ORDER STRIKING NOTICE OF REMOVAL

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Bankruptcy Judge.

Newberg, LP and Robert E. Swain wish to remove to this Court a civil action pending against them in the Worcester County Superior Court in Massachusetts. From the outset, the Court questioned the efficacy of the removal, since the Applicants are not seeking removal of the case to a federal court for the "district and division" where the case is pending, see Fed. R. Bankr...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases