1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 128 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 128 Cal.Rptr.2d 320 (2002)
 

BRONCO WINE CO. v. ESPINOZA

No. C037254.

128 Cal.Rptr.2d 320 (2002)

104 Cal.App.4th 598

BRONCO WINE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. Manuel R. ESPINOZA, as Interim Director, etc., et al., Respondents; Napa Valley Vintners Association, Interveners.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 16, 2003.

Review Granted April 16, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David S. Chaney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Damon M. Connolly, Miguel A. Neri, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, Terry Senne, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents.

Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr. and Steven L. Mayer, San Francisco; Ropes & Gray, Peter M. Brody and Kelly B. Kramer, Washington, Dist. of Columbia, for Petitioners.

Keker & Van Nest, John W. Keker, Henry C. Bunsow, James M. Emery, Ragesh K. Tangri, San Francisco, and Daniel Purcell, for Intervenor.

BLEASE, Acting P.J.

This proceeding arises out of an original petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court by stipulation of the parties.1 Petitioners, Bronco Wine Company and Barrel Ten Quarter Circle, Inc. (hereafter Bronco), seek a writ of mandate prohibiting respondents Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and Manuel R. Espinoza...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases