The trial court erred, in this slip and fall matter, in directing a verdict in favor of defendant at the close of plaintiff's case. When plaintiff's evidence is accorded its proper treatment, that is, accepted as true and given every favorable inference, it provides a sufficient basis for the jury to rationally find in his favor (see, Parvi v City of Kingston,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SEAMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK
294 A.D.2d 144 (2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 35
ROBERT SEAMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 9, 2002.
Decided May 9, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.