VESKY v. ANTUNEZ


191 Misc.2d 246 (2002)

740 N.Y.S.2d 545

ERIK VESKY, Appellant, v. PAULO ANTUNEZ, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 5, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fromme, Schwartz, Newman & Cornicello, LLP, New York City (Peter A. Schwartz and Susan Baumel-Cornicello of counsel), for appellant.

Mayne Miller, New York City, for respondent.

DAVIS, J.P., GANGEL-JACOB and SUAREZ, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment dated April 7, 2000 reversed, with $25 costs, final judgment of possession is granted to petitioner and the matter is remanded to the court below for a hearing to determine use and occupancy due petitioner.

The record evidence does not support application of the illusory tenancy doctrine. Respondent paid $3,000 to the record tenant to take over the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases