The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Moreover, we find the evidence to be overwhelming. Defendant was identified by two eyewitnesses who personally knew him, confessed to another witness, and was arrested several days after the crime while in possession of a revolver that was established by scientific evidence to be the murder weapon.
Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by evidence that
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.