The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his written and videotaped confessions. Although the court suppressed a pistol that had been recovered from defendant's place of work, the court correctly determined that defendant's statements were not products of the unlawful search and seizure. At the time defendant was questioned, he was not in custody for possession of the pistol or any other charge. Instead, defendant voluntarily accompanied the detectives...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
