1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 313 (2002)
 

SCHOENDORF v. U.D. REGISTRY, INC.

No. B146918.

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 313 (2002)

97 Cal.App.4th 227

Faye A. SCHOENDORF, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. U.D. REGISTRY, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 28, 2002.

Review Denied June 12, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Faye A. Schoendorf, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Enenstein, Russell & Saltz, Michael J. Saltz, Jason M. Russell and Darren S. Enenstein for Defendant and Respondent U.D. Registry, Inc.

Harvey A. Saltz, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.

MALLANO, J.

Defendant U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR), is a consumer reporting agency that gathers information about unlawful detainer cases and sells it to landlords and other subscribers. Plaintiff Faye Schoendorf, a tenant, filed this action against UDR, alleging that it was providing misleading and incomplete information about her.

UDR moved to strike the complaint under section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which prohibits "strategic law-suits

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases