1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 300 A.D.2d
  5. 300 A.D.2d 126 (2002)
 

DEITZ v. RENAISSANCE CAPITAL GROUP, LTD.

300 A.D.2d 126 (2002)

750 N.Y.S.2d 758

RICHARD DEITZ, Appellant, v. RENAISSANCE CAPITAL GROUP, LTD., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 17, 2002.

Defendant's motion was properly granted. Defendant, an investment banking company domiciled in Bermuda and with its headquarters and principal place of business in Moscow, Russia, had no contacts with New York upon which jurisdiction over it pursuant to CPLR 302 might have been premised. In any event, plaintiff did not properly serve the foreign defendant with the summons and complaint. Finally, even if jurisdiction had been obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases