The default of the individual respondent, a nonresident who was served pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 253, was properly excused upon a showing that his attorney did not know he had been served, and that plaintiff's attorney knew that respondents' attorney, who timely appeared on behalf of the corporate respondent, intended to appear for the individual respondent as well (see, Johnson v Marriott Mgt. Serv. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GONZALEZ v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
294 A.D.2d 130 (2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 879
LUIS A. GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Defendants, and NATIONAL RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 7, 2002.
Decided May 7, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.