MATTER OF DE LA ROSA


290 A.D.2d 134 (2002)

736 N.Y.S.2d 371

In the Matter of DAN M. DE LA ROSA, an Attorney, Respondent. DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 24, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Hester of counsel (Thomas J. Cahill, attorney), for petitioner.

Howard Benjamin of counsel (Gentile Brotman Maltz & Benjamin LLP, attorneys), for respondent.

NARDELLI, J. P., SAXE, ROSENBERGER, ELLERIN and LERNER, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Dan M. de la Rosa was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on January 23, 1995, and at all times relevant herein, he has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent was served with a notice and statement of charges which alleged that he falsified an expense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases