1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (2002)
 

IN RE COORDINATED LATEX GLOVE LITIGATION

Nos. D036680, D037435.

121 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (2002)

99 Cal.App.4th 594

In re COORDINATED LATEX GLOVE LITIGATION.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing July 15, 2002.

Review Denied October 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bien & Summers, E. Elizabeth Summers, Novato; Kazan, McClain, Edises, Simon & Abrams, Philip A. Harley, Wes Wagnon and James L. Oberman, Oakland, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, James C. Martin, Costa Mesa, Thomas M. Freeman, Oakland, Denise M. Howell, Los Angeles; Seyfarth, Shaw, Robert M. Mitchell and Lawrence E. Butler, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.

HUFFMAN, J.

In this opinion we discuss the two-pronged test for a strict liability manufacturing defect as applied to the production of latex gloves. (Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413, 432, 143 Cal.Rptr. 225, 573 P.2d 443 (Barker).) This products liability action filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases