1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 294 F.3d
  5. 294 F.3d 123 (2002)
 

COSTA DE ORO TELEVISION, INC. v. F.C.C.

No. 01-1153.

294 F.3d 123 (2002)

COSTA DE ORO TELEVISION, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. CoxCom, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry A. Friedman argued the cause for the petitioner.

Joel Marcus, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued the cause for the respondents. Jane E. Mago, General Counsel, Daniel M. Armstrong, Associate General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Catherine G. O'Sullivan and Andrea Limmer, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, were on brief.

Peter H. Feinberg and Scott Dailard were on brief for the intervenor.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a dispute over the procedures the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) uses to determine local television market designations pursuant to the cable television mandatory carriage rules. In particular, Costa de Oro Television, Inc. (Costa) petitions for review of two FCC orders...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases