ORDER
PER CURIAM.
L.W. ("father") appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights to his minor child, S.R.W. ("S.R.W."). Father claims that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because insufficient clear, cogent and convincing evidence existed to support the findings of the court pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo (Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.