Defendant's generalized exception failed to preserve his current challenge to the court's instruction to the jury concerning a purported prior inconsistent statement, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the instruction was proper. Since the initial grand jury presentation was limited to only one of the two contemporaneous sales for which defendant was ultimately
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WRIGHT
295 A.D.2d 117 (2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 546
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY WRIGHT, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 4, 2002.
Decided June 4, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.