1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 300 A.D.2d
  5. 300 A.D.2d 105 (2002)
 

CHICO v. NADLER, D.M.D.

300 A.D.2d 105 (2002)

750 N.Y.S.2d 846

ALBERTO CHICO et al., Respondents, v. SHELDON NADLER, D.M.D., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 12, 2002.

We reject appellant's characterization of the amended complaint as replete with legal conclusions and devoid of factual allegations. Fair notice is given of plaintiff's treatment by appellant on specified dates in specified ways that caused specified injuries, and, at this pleading juncture, we perceive no prejudice caused by plaintiff's description of her injuries and appellant's acts in lay terms (CPLR 3013, 3026; see Foley v D'Agostino, 21 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases