Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. When an officer witnessed defendant receive money from a buyer and point to another person, who immediately gave the buyer several glassine envelopes, while receiving nothing in return, the inference of accessorial liability was inescapable (see, People v Bello,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.