PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ


294 A.D.2d 110 (2002)

740 N.Y.S.2d 709

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 2, 2002.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. When an officer witnessed defendant receive money from a buyer and point to another person, who immediately gave the buyer several glassine envelopes, while receiving nothing in return, the inference of accessorial liability was inescapable (see, People v Bello, 92 N.Y.2d 523). Certainly, these observations, together with the fact that the buyer moments later—but before defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases