1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 286 (2002)
 

SCHIFANDO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. B142999.

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 286 (2002)

97 Cal.App.4th 312

Steve SCHIFANDO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

Review Granted July 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Robert M. Ball, Robert M. Ball and Loyst P. Fletcher for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Leslie E. Brown, Assistant City Attorney, and Marie McTeague, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

KITCHING, J.

We address an issue in this case that the California Supreme Court has identified but has not decided. The issue is whether a city employee must exhaust both the administrative remedy provided by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov.Code, § 12900 et seq.) and an administrative remedy provided by the city charter. We conclude consistent with the purposes of the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement that a city employee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases