Defendant's challenge to the court's instruction effectively informing the jury that the element of serious physical injury had been established as a matter of law is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the charge was correct because defendant, expressly electing to pursue a defense of misidentification only, conceded the element and agreed to the instruction now at issue (see People v Flynn...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
