1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 69 S.W.3d
  5. 69 S.W.3d 332 (2002)
 

MAHER v. HERRMAN

No. 2-00-404-CV.

69 S.W.3d 332 (2002)

Constance MAHER, Individually and d/b/a The Maher Law Firm, Appellant, v. David E. HERRMAN, and Herrman & Herrman, L.L.P., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Rehearing Overruled March 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thurman & Andres, Charles W. McGarry, Dallas, for Appellant.

Chamberlain McHaney, Ranelle Moore Meroney, Tim Poteet, Austin, for Appellee.

Panel B: DAY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Introduction

The Maher Law Firm and Constance Maher sued Regina Elkins, a former employee, to collect on an alleged loan and for slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy. In the same action, Maher lodged slander, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy claims against David E. Herrman and Herrman & Herrman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases