1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 53 P.3d
  5. 53 P.3d 347 (2002)
 

LOZA v. ARROYO DAIRY

No. 27010.

53 P.3d 347 (2002)

137 Idaho 764

Salvador LOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARROYO DAIRY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

August 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeHaan Associates, Twin Falls, for appellant. Harry C. DeHaan argued.

Merrill Merrill, Pocatello, for respondent. David C. Nye argued.

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

We affirm the district court's grant of Arroyo Dairy's motion in limine precluding the admission of the dairy owners' statements concerning liability insurance. We conclude that the evidence has not been shown to be relevant, and the district court correctly held that any marginal relevance was outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

This case concerns an injury sustained by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases