We disagree with the conclusion of the motion court, although not its ultimate disposition, and find that an issue of fact exists as to whether defendants' armored vehicle was illegally double-parked (see 34 RCNY 4-08 [f]), as it has been held that a violation of a double-parking statute is some evidence of negligence which should go to the jury (Ferguson v Gassman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MURRAY-DAVIS v. RAPID ARMORED CORPORATION
300 A.D.2d 96 (2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 37
WILHEMINA MURRAY-DAVIS et al., Respondents, v. RAPID ARMORED CORPORATION et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 12, 2002.
Decided December 12, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.