1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 199 F.Supp.2d
  5. 199 F.Supp.2d 197 (2002)
 

NEXELL THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. AMCELL CORP.

No. CIV.A. 00-141-RRM.

199 F.Supp.2d 197 (2002)

NEXELL THERAPEUTICS, INC., Becton Dickinson and Company, and the Johns Hopkins University, Plaintiffs, v. AMCELL CORPORATION, Miltenyi Biotech, Inc., and Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

April 19, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip A. Rovner, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Donald R. Ware, Claire Laporte, Robert L. Bocchino, Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP, Boston, Massachusetts; James W. Inskeep, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, Newport Beach, California; counsel for plaintiffs.

Richard H. Morse, Josy W. Ingersoll, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Karen J. Kramer, Law Offices of Karen J. Kramer, Somers, New York; Willem G. Schuurman, Vinson & Elkins, Austin, Texas; counsel for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Presently before the court is the motion of plaintiffs Nexell Therapeutics, Inc., Becton Dickinson and Company, and The Johns Hopkins University to amend the court's April 23, 2001 order granting defendant AmCell's motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

While the facts and procedural background of this case are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases