1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 97 Ohio
  5. 97 Ohio St.3d 296 (2002)
 

HUDSON v. SUMMIT CTY.

No. 2001-1328.

97 Ohio St.3d 296 (2002)

2002-Ohio-6507

HUDSON, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SUMMIT COUNTY ET AL, APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter & Haverfield, L.L.P., Charles T. Riehl, Barbara R. Marburger and R. Todd Hunt, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sandy J. Rubino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee Summit County.

Max Rothal, Akron Law Director, and Cheri Burt Cunningham, Assistant Law Director, for appellant and cross-appellee city of Akron.

MOYER, C.J.

{¶ 1} From 1977 to 1993, 26 residential subdivisions were built in what was then known as Hudson Township. Pursuant to contracts between appellant and cross-appellee Summit County and the developers of those subdivisions, water lines were constructed at the developers' expense and then conveyed to Summit County. In exchange, the county allowed the developers to connect the water system to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases