1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 300 A.D.2d
  5. 300 A.D.2d 92 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. ADAMS

300 A.D.2d 92 (2002)

751 N.Y.S.2d 470

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DUPREE ADAMS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 12, 2002.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting a portion of defendant's postarrest statement into evidence despite his objection as to its relevance. The relevance of the challenged evidence to the credibility of defendant, who testified at trial, outweighed the minimal potential for prejudice (see People v Scarola, 71 N.Y.2d 769, 777).

The court also properly exercised its discretion by denying defendant's request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases