Defendant claims that the attorney who represented him during the pre-accusatory, investigatory stage of the case improperly revealed privileged information to the prosecutor, and that the prosecutor improperly used the allegedly privileged information at a bail hearing. However, any issues relating to pretrial incarceration or release on bail were rendered moot by defendant's conviction (see People ex rel. Chakwin v Warden,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. TATIS-DURAN
300 A.D.2d 84 (2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 751
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NELSON TATIS-DURAN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 10, 2002.
Decided December 10, 2002.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
