TURBOCARE DIV. OF DEMAG DELAVAL v. GENERAL ELEC.

No. CIV.A. 95-30069-MAP.

214 F.Supp.2d 170 (2002)

TURBOCARE DIVISION OF DEMAG DELAVAL TURBOMACHINERY CORP., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 9, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catriona Collins, Cohen, Pontani, Lieberman & Pavane, New York City, Michael J. Coyne, Bacon & Wilson, Springfield, MA, Francis J. Murphy, Lieberman & Nowak, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Christopher J. Renk, Allegretti & Witcoff, Thomas K. Pratt, Banner & Allegretti, Ltd., Mark T. Banner, Esq., Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, John P. Iwanicki, Banner & Allegretti, Ltd., Boston, MA, for Defendant.

C. Brian McDonald, Bulkley, Richardson & Gelinas, Springfield, MA, for Movant.


MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY (Docket No. 226)

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Turbocare Division of Demag Delaval Turbomachinery Corp. ("plaintiff"), has brought suit against General Electric Co. ("defendant"), for the alleged infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,436,311 ("the '311 patent"), which is directed to a shaft sealing system for fluid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases