The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's accessorial liability was established by the totality of the conduct of defendant and his codefendant. This included evidence that defendant screened the undercover buyer, and after approving him as a customer, directed him to pay the codefendant, directed the codefendant to go upstairs for the obvious purpose of obtaining drugs, permitted the codefendant to pass...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
