1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 42 P.3d
  5. 42 P.3d 339 (2002)
 

MAXWELL v. STEBBINS

99 CV 0130; A112488

42 P.3d 339 (2002)

180 Or. App. 201

William Stirling MAXWELL, Appellant, v. Michael R. STEBBINS and Nickolas C. Nylander, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 13, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Stirling Maxwell filed the brief pro se.

Charles D. Carlson and Brown, Roseta, Long, McConville, Kircullen & Carlson, Eugene, filed the brief for respondent Michael R. Stebbins.

Joel S. DeVore and Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene, filed the brief for respondent Nickolas C. Nylander.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants, which was dismissed with prejudice following motions to dismiss under ORCP 21. Plaintiff appealed the judgment dismissing the complaint. Meanwhile, plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to ORCP 71 B(1). The trial court denied the motion, and plaintiff now appeals that decision. In Maxwell v. Stebbins, 180 Or.App. 48, 42 P.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases