WAGMAN v. BRADSHAW


292 A.D.2d 84 (2002)

739 N.Y.S.2d 421

BRADLEY WAGMAN, Respondent, v. LEDFORD A. BRADSHAW et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 18, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Tusa, Lake Success (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellants.

FLORIO, J.P., GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

LUCIANO, J.

The question before the Court is whether a chiropractor who treated the plaintiff was properly permitted to testify as to the contents of an inadmissible written report interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) films, which was prepared by another healthcare professional who did not testify, when the MRI films were not in evidence, and without proof that, as out-of-court material, the written MRI report was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases