1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 98 Ohio
  5. 98 Ohio St.3d 277 (2002)
 

NEW PAR v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 2001-1132.

98 Ohio St.3d 277 (2002)

2002-Ohio-7245

NEW PAR, F.K.A. AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, N.K.A. VERIZON, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 30, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Kathleen M. Trafford, Daniel W. Costello and Thomas O. Gorman, for appellants.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Steven T. Nourse, Duane W. Luckey, Kimberly A. Danosi and Thomas W. McNamee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

Hahn, Loeser & Parks, L.L.P., Robert J. Fogarty, Randy J. Hart, Janine L. Migden and Mark D. Griffin; Tricarichi & Carnes and Carla M. Tricarichi, for intervening appellee Westside Cellular, Inc.

FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right. The appellants are New Par, f.k.a. AirTouch Cellular, n.k.a. Verizon, and a number of other entities that have done business as cellular telephone service providers. The appellees are the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("commission") and intervenor Westside Cellular, Inc., which does business as Cellnet.

{¶ 2} Cellnet is a cellular telephone service reseller. As such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases