1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 76 S.W.3d
  5. 76 S.W.3d 280 (2002)
 

BARTON v. STATE

No. SC 83615.

76 S.W.3d 280 (2002)

Walter BARTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

June 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth U. Carlyle, Lee's Summit, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law made by a court upon motion for post-conviction relief must be specific enough to permit meaningful appellate review. State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 932 (Mo. banc 1994). The findings and conclusions in this case relating to disclosure of the dismissal of a pending criminal charge in exchange for testimony by a witness for the state are not specific enough. As the findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases