1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 349 S.C.
  5. 349 S.C. 7 (2002)
 

THOMASKO v. POOLE

No. 25425.

349 S.C. 7 (2002)

561 S.E.2d 597

Dr. Martha THOMASKO, Petitioner, v. Daniel E. POOLE, Jr., Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided March 11, 2002.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Widener, of McNair Law Firm, of Columbia; and Robert A. Muckenfuss, of McGuire Woods, of Charlotte, NC, for petitioner.

David S. Cobb, of Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, of Charleston, for respondent.

BURNETT, Justice:

Dr. Martha Thomasko ("Thomasko") sued Daniel Poole, Jr., ("Poole") for negligence as a result of an vehicle accident. The trial court denied plaintiff Thomasko's motion for a directed verdict on the issue of her comparative negligence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court in an unpublished opinion, and Thomasko appealed to this Court. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases