1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 115 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 234 (2002)
 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. RADOS BROS.

No. D037231.

115 Cal.Rptr.2d 234 (2002)

95 Cal.App.4th 309

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RADOS BROS., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

As Modified on January 7 and January 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Kaheny, City Attorney, City of Chula Vista; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Charles A. Bird; Daley & Heft, Dennis W. Daley and James D. Mathison, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Asaro, Keagy, Freeland & McKinley, Roscoe D. Keagy, Richard R. Freeland; and Charles F. Campbell, San Diego, for Defendant and Respondent.

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

In this eminent domain action, plaintiff Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the Agency) appeals a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant Rados Bros. (Rados). The Agency persuasively contends the trial court erred by determining the acquisition of the Rados property was not for a public use, the property was not necessary for the redevelopment project in question and the acquisition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases