1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 256 Wis.2d
  5. 256 Wis.2d 80 (2002)
 

STATE v. MILLER

No. 01-1993-CR.

256 Wis.2d 80 (2002)

2002 WI App 150

647 N.W.2d 348

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tina M. MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Tim Provis, Madison.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Erik C. Peterson, Iowa County District Attorney, Dodgeville.

Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ.

¶ 1. DYKMAN, J.

Tina Miller appeals from a judgment convicting her of possessing a controlled substance. She contends that the police violated her right against unreasonable searches and seizures when they conducted a canine sniff on her car, entered it and searched her purse. Because controlling precedent requires us to conclude that the dog sniff was not a search, and because the dog's alert on Miller's vehicle provided the police with probable cause, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases