S. CAL. EDISON CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM.

Nos. B155748, B157031, B157038, B157773, B160717.

125 Cal.Rptr.2d 211 (2002)

101 Cal.App.4th 982

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE of California, Respondent; County of Los Angeles, Petitioner, v. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent; The California Cogeneration Council, Petitioner, v. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent; Independent Energy Producers Association, Petitioner, v. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent; Central Hydroelectric Corporation, Petitioner, v. The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 30, 2002.

Review Denied November 26, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Pickett, Russell C. Swartz and James B. Woodruff, Rosemead, for Petitioner Southern California Edison Company.

Lloyd W. Pellman, John F. Krattli, Los Angeles, Lillian D. Salinger, and Roger A. Berliner, Washington, Dist of Columbia, for Petitioner County of Los Angeles.

White & Case, Jerry R. Bloom, Los Angeles, Dan Woods, Joseph M. Karp and Karen E. Edmonson, Los Angeles, for Petitioner The California Cogeneration Council.

Ellison, Schneider & Harris, Douglas K. Kerner, Sacramento, for Petitioner Independent Energy Producers Association.

Dale W. Mahon, Elk Grove, for Petitioner Central Hydroelectric Corporation.

Gary M. Cohen, Mary F. McKenzie, San Francisco, and Amy C. Yip-Kikugawa, for Public Utilities Commission of the State of California.


MUNOZ (AURELIO), J.*

We issued a writ of review in this case to consider the lawfulness of certain rulings by the Public Utilities Commission (Commission), revising a formula adopted pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 390, subdivision (b), which is used to determine the amount petitioner Southern California Edison (Edison) is required to pay certain providers of small amounts of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases