1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 215 F.Supp.2d
  5. 215 F.Supp.2d 120 (2002)
 

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT v. GITTENS

No. CIV. 02-0984(RJL).

215 F.Supp.2d 120 (2002)

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., Plaintiff v. Anthony GITTENS and The District of Columbia, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 7, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Barry Spitzer, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Martha Jane Mullen, Robert C. Utiger, Office of Corp. Counsel, D.C., Washington, DC, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEON, District Judge.

The City of Washington, D.C. ("the City") through its Commission on Arts and the Humanities ("DCCAH" or "the Commission"), began organizing a public art exhibit last year, the purpose of which was to showcase the "whimsical and imaginative side of the Nation's Capital", to make "public art acceptable, increase tourism, and to have FUN."1

According to Anthony Gittens, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases