1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 259 Conn.
  5. 259 Conn. 75 (2002)
 

STATE v. CENTENO

(SC 16494)

259 Conn. 75 (2002)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. THOMAS CENTENO

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released January 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Visone, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Scott J. Murphy, state's attorney, and Mary Rose Palmese, supervisory assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court, in affirming the judgment of the trial court in a per curiam opinion; see State v. Centeno, 61 Conn.App. 906, 763 A.2d 1096 (2001); properly concluded that the trial court had not abused its discretion by failing to inquire into or investigate further the defendant's allegation, made following his conviction but before sentencing, that he knew one...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases