The court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (Workers' Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]), since the documentary and testimonial evidence support conflicting inferences as to whether plaintiff, at the time of the alleged accident, was, in fact, a special employee of defendant (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.