Contrary to defendant's contention, the "safety hat" provision of the Industrial Code (12 NYCRR 23-1.8 [c] [1]) is sufficiently concrete and specific in its mandate to support plaintiff's Labor Law § 241 (6) claim (see generally Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.