This action to recover upon a mechanic's lien was properly dismissed, since plaintiff failed to meet its burden to establish that the last work performed or materials furnished under the contracts at issue was performed or furnished within the eight-month period preceding the filing of the lien (see Lien Law § 10). Plaintiff's proof was not adequate to demonstrate that the work and materials allegedly provided by it within the statutorily crucial eight-month period...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
