1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 38 P.3d
  5. 38 P.3d 288 (2002)
 

FREDERICK v. CITY OF PORTLAND

99-01-00952; A111378

38 P.3d 288 (2002)

178 Or. App. 571

Timothy J. FREDERICK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip A. Lewis argued the cause, for appellant. On the briefs were Heather Van Meter and Ater Wynne LLP, Portland.

Harry Auerbach, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

LANDAU, P.J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment affirming a City of Portland (city) administrative order excluding him from the city's "drug-free zones" for a one-year period. We conclude that, because the one-year period had expired by the time of the trial court's decision, the case was moot. We therefore remand with instructions to vacate the judgment.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. The Portland City Code (PCC) designates certain areas as "drug-free...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases