OPINION OF THE COURT
PRUDENTI, P.J.
The plaintiff is seeking reimbursement for certain medical expenses incurred by her adult son. The theory upon which she seeks such recovery, that is, the defendants' alleged violation of the "Dram Shop Act" (General Obligations Law §§ 11-100, 11-101), is one which would not have been available to the plaintiff's son himself, whose own intoxication led to the injuries which necessitated medical treatment (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.