1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 182 (2002)
 

BONTRAGER v. SISKIYOU COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD

No. C037148.

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 182 (2002)

97 Cal.App.4th 325

Carl A. BONTRAGER, as Assessor, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SISKIYOU COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; Yreka Investment Group et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aronowitz, Bordelon & Skidmore, Paul S. Aronowitz and Lawrence E. Skidmore, Auburn, for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Leland H. Jordan, San Rafael, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

RAYE, J.

In order to provide housing for lowincome renters in rural areas, the federal government developed housing programs aimed at subsidizing properties to produce lower rents. In a form of quid pro quo, the government subsidizes the interest rate on the financing for the property; in return, the owner lowers the rent to make it affordable to eligible renters. One of these programs, section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. § 1485), commonly known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases