In the Matter of WEST 41ST STREET REALTY LLC et al., Petitioners,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of 632 EIGHTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of ROMACK REALTY CORP., Petitioner,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of THREE O REALTY LLC, Petitioner,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 20, 2002.
June 20, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Guy Miller Struve of counsel (Rebecca L. Winters, Laura Ann Rosenbury and Lorilee A. Vaughan on the brief; Davis Polk & Wardwell, attorneys), for West 41st Street Realty LLC, and others, petitioners.
Donna-Marie Korth of counsel (M. Allan Hyman and Edward G. McCabe on the brief; Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, attorneys), for 632 Eighth Avenue Associates, LLC and another, petitioners.
Mark I. Silberblatt of counsel (Novack Burnbaum Crystal LLP, attorneys), for Three O Realty LLC, petitioner.
John R. Casolaro of counsel (Joseph M. Ryan and Susan B. Kalib on the brief; Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, attorneys), for New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as Empire State Development Corporation and another, respondents.
SAXE, J.P., ROSENBERGER, FRIEDMAN and MARLOW, JJ., concur.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
OPINION OF THE COURT
BUCKLEY, J.
This original proceeding, brought pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 207, involves the well-publicized and previously litigated renovation of Times Square (see, e.g. Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. Corp.,67 N.Y.2d 400). Specifically, six real property owners challenge a determination and findings of respondent New York State Urban Development Corporation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
