DUSTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. F039023.

122 Cal.Rptr.2d 176 (2002)

99 Cal.App.4th 1311

Terry Dale DUSTIN, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California, Stanislaus County, Respondent. The People, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

As Modified August 8, 2002.

Review Denied September 25, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tim Bazar, Public Defender, Martha J. Carlton-Magana, Deputy Public Defender; and Krista Hart, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

James C. Brazelton, District Attorney, and Rick Distaso, Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

WISEMAN, J.

In capital cases, appellate courts and legislatures have long recognized the compelling need for ensuring reliability in determining whether death is the appropriate punishment. The reason for this disparate treatment is obvious—the death penalty is qualitatively different even when compared to a life sentence. This fundamental principle undoubtedly explains why the California Legislature enacted Penal Code section 190.9, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases