RILEY v. HILTON HOTELS CORP.

No. B153812.

123 Cal.Rptr.2d 157 (2002)

100 Cal.App.4th 599

Kathleen RILEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Review Denied October 16, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schreiber & Schreiber, Edwin C. Schreiber and Eric A. Schreiber for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McNamara, Spira & Smith, Michael P. McNamara, Los Angeles, and David Campbell Smith for Defendants and Respondents.


EPSTEIN, J.

A local ordinance was amended during the pendency of a lawsuit to recite that it does not impose the duty that the defendants allegedly breached. In this case, we consider whether the amendment is in fact a substantive change in the law, and if so whether the language of the amending ordinance, and the scant legislative history of record, are adequate to give the change retroactive application. The trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases