1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 80 S.W.3d
  5. 80 S.W.3d 184 (2002)
 

SCOTT v. STATE

No. 10-01-169-CR.

80 S.W.3d 184 (2002)

Richard SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Rehearing Overruled July 17, 2002.

Discretionary Review Refused October 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Scott, Hamilton, pro se.

B.J. Shepherd, Hamilton County Dist. Atty., Martin L. Peterson, Hamilton County Asst. Dist. Atty., Meridian, for appellee.

Before Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY.

OPINION

REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves Richard Scott's assertion of indigence on appeal, his right to a free appellate record, and his right to court-appointed counsel. The trial court refused to find Scott indigent because: (1) it did not have before it a pleading requesting such a finding; and (2) Scott and his witnesses refused to provide testimony "under penalty of perjury," stating that to do so would be contrary to their religious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases