PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree burglary, first-degree theft, and menacing. On appeal, he advances a number of assignments of error, only two of which merit discussion. First, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the menacing charge because there was no evidence that he threatened the victim. The state concedes the error, and we accept the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.